Invisible Man Review: A Solid Thriller With Plotholes

Following 13 years of development limbo, the film was scheduled to be a part of the Dark Universe, a cinematic world crafted from Frankenstein, Mr. Hyde and other classic Hollywood movie monsters.

Universal Pictures

After the 2017 Tom Cruise film “The Mummy” lost the studio an estimated $95 million, Universal dropped all plans for the shared universe, leaving “Invisible Man” dead in the water. Producer Jason Blum jumped in to revive the project last year and released it under his successful Blumhouse Productions brand, refocusing the film from a classic monster movie to a modern day story about abused women.

Elizabeth Moss stars as a physically and emotionally mistreated woman named Cecilia, who lives in terror as her obsessive boyfriend Adrian (Oliver Jackson-Cohen) controls every aspect of her life. As Cecilia manages to escape her boyfriend’s compound, she learns he has committed suicide and left her his estate. Her relief is short lived, however, as she discovers someone who she can’t see is stalking her and making her life hell again. 

Universal Pictures

Cecilia believes Adrian is still alive and somehow managed to become invisible so no one will believe her. The film shines far more than it falters. From the opening sequence it lays the groundwork of tension to create anxiety and dread.

Writer and director Leigh Whannell has a successful history of good psychological thrillers with the “Saw” and “Insidious” franchises. His ability to project his protagonist’s paranoia onto the audience is the film’s biggest selling point. They feel Cecilia’s panic.  Moss delivers a spellbinding performance with Cecilia’s engaging descent into madness, especially in scenes where she is alone on camera—making audiences believe Adrian is lurking in the room. 

Universal Pictures

Secondary characters don’t provide much depth given their screen time, making them one-noted. The score’s intensity and camerawork’s intimacy make up for lackluster acting, however, transmitting every punch and scream.

The Invisible Man is largely well-crafted but lacks a back-story for the haunting Adrian, because it was rewritten to separate it from its original cinematic universe.  Adrian is described as a violent, narcissistic psychopath, but questions remain unanswered about how he got that way. His wealth is established early but viewers never find out where it came from, how he created his invisibility technology, or who he works for.

Critically, his invisibility suit’s creation story remains a mystery. Given the two-hour runtime, a few more minutes of exposition would sharpen the plot.  Some critics frame “Invisible Man” as a thinly veiled commentary on a society that seldom believes women who claim toxic men abuse them. But calling the film a #MeToo lesson is misleading. 

Universal Pictures

There is no lecture about how bad men are. And unlike in “Charlie’s Angels” and “Birds of Prey,” there’s no attempt to condemn them. If there’s a #MeToo tie-in, that story belongs to actor Johnny Depp who was set to star as the lead going back to Early 2016. This changed as allegations of domestic abuse by his ex-wife, Amber Heard was made public. Due to the public backlash, he later dropped out of the role causing the studio to change it’s course creatively. 

Heard later admitted in an audio recording that she struck Depp numerous times with pots and pans as she noted that no one would believe him because he was a man. Heard propped herself up as an ambassador for women’s rights and domestic violence but was later found to have committed the same crimes she accused others of.

Blumhouse has reinforced its image as the home of smart and focused horror flicks, setting the standard for fresh takes on an old classic.





Don’t forget to Subscribe for Updates. Also, Follow Us at Society-ReviewsYouTubeInstagramTwitterOdyseeTwitch, & Letterboxd

2 thoughts on “Invisible Man Review: A Solid Thriller With Plotholes

  1. This is one of your few reviews where I have to disagree with you. To me, this read as Victim Porn all the way. First, they hire the all-time queen of victim porn, Elizabeth Moss, and then proceed to get her to act at the peak of victimhood. We get the entirely cliche turn of fighting back and the most predictable outcome ever. They could have done so much more with this but chose to keep it as victimy as possible. It advanced no character, all who were just flat cutouts to heighten the victimization.

    I wouldn’t give this movie even a full 1. But Moss will always be the queen of victim acting, this shows her at her peak.

Leave a Reply