I can tell you from the outset that this review will not align with the critical consensus. I was genuinely surprised by the wave of positive notices the film received. Arrival begins with the sudden appearance of twelve alien spacecraft at various locations around the globe. Uncertain of the visitors’ intentions, the United States assembles a team led by linguist Louise Banks (Amy Adams), theoretical physicist Ian Donnelly (Jeremy Renner), and Colonel Weber (Forest Whitaker) to establish communication before other nations—particularly China—escalate the situation into global conflict. Anyone expecting an Independence Day-style spectacle will be disappointed. The bulk of the runtime is devoted to the painstaking process of decoding an alien language and attempting to build understanding. That focus does not make for a particularly dynamic two-hour experience.
On a technical level the film is competent. The problem lies in the storytelling. Interspersed throughout are scenes that appear to be flashbacks of Louise and a daughter who died of illness. Only later does the movie reveal these are actually visions of the future. The more contact Louise has with the aliens, the stronger and more frequent these visions become. Why this happens is never adequately explained, even though the visions ultimately drive the film’s resolution. Character development is equally thin. Most figures are sketched in broad stereotypes with little context. The Chinese and Russian contingents are portrayed as hawkish obstacles whose aggressive posture endangers the planet, seemingly because the script requires geopolitical tension. There is even a sequence in which rogue soldiers attempt to plant a bomb on one of the ships, an act of reckless brinkmanship that feels more like a convenient plot device than a believable human response.
Louise herself remains under-drawn. Because the apparent flashbacks are later re-contextualized as future events, the audience is left with almost no grounded sense of who she is as a person or why she, specifically, is indispensable to the military effort beyond a prior consulting credit. Jeremy Renner’s physicist is given even less dimension; his primary function seems to be standing nearby and occasionally offering technical observations. A faint romantic thread between Louise and Ian is introduced with minimal development—essentially one conversation establishing they are both single—before the story moves on. The central conflict never generates real urgency. The primary source of tension is the race to prevent China from taking unilateral military action, a crisis resolved through an especially convenient narrative shortcut.
I spent much of the film in a state of mild confusion, not the productive kind that invites deeper reflection, but the frustrating kind that leaves you questioning basic motivations and causal links. Visually the movie has a cool, controlled aesthetic, yet strong images cannot compensate for a story that feels simultaneously over-explained and under-clarified. Arrival wants to be regarded as intelligent, contemplative science fiction. Instead it comes across as a muddy narrative that gestures toward big ideas—time, language, choice—without doing the work required to make those ideas cohere or land emotionally.
Amy Adams delivers a committed, emotionally open performance, but she is working with material that never fully supports her. The shortcomings belong primarily to the adaptation of Ted Chiang’s celebrated short story; the screenplay strains for profundity while leaving character, motivation, and logic underdeveloped. The result is a film that feels longer than its runtime, more confusing than enlightening, and ultimately unsatisfying.

 

1/5

 

 

9 responses to “Arrival Review: Muddy Narrative Mixed With A Confusing Plot”

  1. Why’d you give the disclaimer man? I was to ready to rage and rage! :p A 1 star’s definitely pretty low. I’m used to watching a bunch of bad films, but it always stings to watch something that sad. I’ve definitely had my reservations about this one and I’m glad that I didn’t check it out in theaters now!

    Like

    1. A buddy of mines gave it a ?/10

      That’s actually more accurate than my rating.

      Like

      1. That’s a scary thought. I’m definitely going to take my sweet time before watching this film…or I just won’t watch it at all.

        Like

  2. Wow! Just 1 star? That’s harsh, man lol. I guess I can see that. It was slooooow. And it was confusing at points. Overall, though, I thought it was well made with good performances and a unique story. The concept was somewhat experimental so I’m not surprised people didn’t like it. I went to the theater with my wife and I was expecting an evil glare on the way home but she actually kind of liked it. It’s one of those movies where you need to be careful who you recommend it to.

    Like

    1. Yeah, the feedback has been 50-50 on the movie overall. Some complained about the film being too confusing, others praise it for it’s Nolan like style and performances. Can’t really disagree with many points people made.

      Like

  3. Finally, I found someone who did not like this movie that much. I am yet to see this film, but I think the plot is just too realistic (I mean, the chances that aliens are roughly of some earthly dimension are slim, etc.).

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yeah I stand by my rating for this one

      Liked by 1 person

  4. […] I couldn’t shake the feeling that I was watching Arrival especially since both films are Paramount Pictures movies. Considering I was one of the few people […]

    Like

  5. […] as much as the critics. Everything that I’ve seen in the trailers and heard about reminded me of Arrival, a film hailed by critics as a masterpiece that I just didn’t care for. My fears only […]

    Like

Leave a comment

Trending